When will be TCUP 4.9?

[m^2]

Achieving 100 mb of size makes absolutely no sense. Why not 101 mb? Target is function and not any superficial points.

A personal, unofficial opinion:

Why not 102? 105? 120? 200? 2048?
It makes sense to say "stop" at some point because the more you add the less people will use it. TC UP is way too powerful for great majority of it's users. So why add more? Why put our work in something that will be used by just a few?

Kind of modularity that would encourage users to extend TC UP themselves and share such extensions could possibly make some sense, though I don't think it would get off the ground.

IMO it makes no sense to continue to extend TC UP the way we used to do.