Posts: 401
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation:
0
As the name suggests, Paint.NET uses .NET and therefore it's not a viable option.
And there is Artweaver already, is there something about it that you dislike?
Posts: 128
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation:
0
I can say, what I dislike =)
Art Weaver is a bad copy of Photoshop. A lot of simple but yet very cool features in hotkeys and tools are missing (like double click to open, autosize for copied images, alt as zoom modifier and etc.). Whole concept of brushes is strange for me, layers without links and masks have very poor functionality. Many other things can be mentioned but it's free program, nothing to cry about =)
Posts: 128
Threads: 1
Joined: Jun 2008
Reputation:
0
You are welcome =)
By the way: I have tried Paint.NET. IMHO there's no real reason to add it inside.